A question for those who accuse Obama of being "dangerous" because he is "a Muslim"?

I ume those accusers are not supporters of Kucinich, Ron Paul, Mitt Romney and others who opposed NATO's Jihad against Serbia, which was on behalf of extremist Muslims. So what is the logic, is Islam "good"? So what is bad about Obama, even if he were a Muslim (which he is not)? So is Islam "bad"? Then let me quote what the "grate loss" for... Israel yesterday, Tom Lantos, said in April 2007: "Just a reminder to the predominantly Muslim led governments in this world, that here is yet another example that the US leads the way for the creation of a predominantly Muslim country in the very heart of Europe. This should be noted by... Jihadists of all color and hue". So here that US congressman, admitted (without using excuses like "war crimes" and "ethnic cleansing") that "the US" (means dominant US politicions) are in favor of imposing the creation of a Muslim state in the heart of Christian Europe. So, if it is "a good thing", then, even if Obama were a Muslim, what's wrong about it?